Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00000539-200408000-00039.
|
Author: | Taekman, Jeffrey M. MD *; Hobbs, Gene CHT *; Barber, Linda MSN ++; Phillips-Bute, Barbara G. PhD *; Wright, Melanie C. PhD *; Newman, Mark F. MD +; Stafford-Smith, Mark FRCPC +
|
Institution: | *Department of Anesthesiology and the Human Simulation and Patient Safety Center of Duke University; +Global Perioperative Research Organization; and ++Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
|
Title: | |
Source: | Anesthesia & Analgesia. 99(2):521-527, August 2004.
|
Abstract: | Training of health care research personnel is acritical component of quality assurance in clinical trials. Interactivity (such as simulation) is desirable compared with traditional methods of teaching. We hypothesized that the addition of an interactive simulation exercise to standard training methods would increase the confidence of study coordinators. A simulation exercise was developed to replicate a complex clinical trial. Eighteen study coordinators completed pre- and postexercise confidence questionnaires. Questions were targeted at key trial components using a 0-10 scale (not confident to confident) and were categorized using Bloom's Taxonomy. The primary analysis compared overall mean pre-and postexercise responses. Secondary analyses assessed affective, psychomotor, and cognitive confidence. Significance was at P < 0.05. A significant increase in overall confidence (8.64 versus 5.77; P < 0.0001) was reproduced in the subcategory analyses (affective, 8.24 versus 4.89; P < 0.0001; cognitive, 8.75 versus 6.42; P = 0.0003; psychomotor, 8.63 versus 5.26; P < 0.0001). A high level of internal consistency and reliability in question responses within domains was observed, validating the questionnaire tool. In this preliminary report, we confirmed that addition of a simulation exercise to the training of study coordinators resulted in increased confidence. Simulation exercises should be considered when training study coordinators for clinical research trials.
(C) 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
|
References: | 1. Bodenheimer T. Uneasy alliance: clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1539-44.
2. Marshall JB. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:287-91.
3. Parry BR, Williams SM. Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve. Aust N Z J Surg 1991;61:419-22.
4. Bull C, Yates R, Sarkar D, et al. Scientific, ethical, and logistical considerations in introducing a new operation: a retrospective cohort study from paediatric cardiac surgery. Br Med J 2000;320:1168-73.
5. Hasan A, Pozzi M, Hamilton JR. New surgical procedures: can we minimise the learning curve? Br Med J 2000;320:171-3.
6. Bloom BS, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. New York: D. McKay Co. Inc., 1956.
7. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/ performance. Acad Med 1990;65:S63-7.
8. Smith LF. The effects of confidence and perception of test-taking skills on performance. North Am J Psych 2002;4:37-50.
9. Nickerson RS, McGoldrick CC. Confidence ratings and level of performance on a judgmental task. Percept Mot Skills 1965;20:311-6.
10. Smith RE, Christensen DS. Psychological skills as predictors of performance and survival in professional baseball. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1996;17:399-415.
11. Ritchie D, Hoffman R. Incorporating instructional design principles with the world wide web. In: Khan B, ed. Web based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1997:135-8.
12. Davis D, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867-74.
13. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: a review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992;268:1111-7.
14. Thurstone L. The theory of multiple factors. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers, Inc., 1934.
15. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D. A worldwide survey of the use of simulation in anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:659-62.
16. Gaba DM. Simulator training in anesthesia growing rapidly. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter, 1995.
17. Gaba DM. Improving anesthesiologists' performance by simulating reality. Anesthesiology 1992;76:491-4.
18. Marshall RL, Smith JS, Gorman PJ, et al. Use of a human patient simulator in the development of resident trauma management skills. J Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 2001;51:17-21.
19. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, et al. Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings. Anesthesiology 1998;89:8-18.
20. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, et al. Anesthesia crisis resource management training: teaching anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992;63:763-70.
21. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458-63; Discussion 63-4.
22. Gaba DM, DeAnda A. A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: recreating the operating room for research and training. Anesthesiology 1988;69:387-94.
23. Weinger MB, Ancoli-Israel S. Sleep deprivation and clinical performance. J Am Med Assoc 2002;287:955-7.
24. Nyssen AS, Larbuisson R, Janssens M, et al. A comparison of the training value of two types of anesthesia simulators: computer screen-based and mannequin-based simulators. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1560-5.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH: Research Report.
|
Journal Subset: | Nursing. Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 0003-2999
|
NLM Journal Code: | 4r8, 1310650
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.AN...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|