Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00004836-201703000-00002.
|
Author: | Zhang, Zhi-Feng MS; Duan, Zhi-Jun MD, PhD; Wang, Li-Xia MS; Zhao, Gang MB; Deng, Wu-Guo PhD
|
Institution: | (*)Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China (+)Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
|
Title: | |
Source: | Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 51(3):e17-e26, March 2017.
|
Abstract: | Background: Pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The results of previous studies evaluating aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer solution for reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) are inconsistent.
Aim: We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer solution reduced PEP.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing aggressive hydration with standard hydration with the same lactated Ringer solution for prophylaxis of PEP were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and CINAHL databases. ClinicalTrial.gov and International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry were also searched for unpublished studies. A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systemic Reviews of Intervention.
Results: A total of 7 RCTs with 1047 participants were included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that aggressive hydration reduced the incidence of PEP as compared with standard hydration [odds ratio (OR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-0.72; P=0.0006]. Aggressive hydration also reduced the incidence of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia as compared with standard hydration (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59; P<0.00001). No difference of adverse effects was found between aggressive hydration and standard hydration (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15-1.57; P=0.23). Sensitivity analyses showed that neither alternative effect measures nor statistical models regarding heterogeneity affected the conclusions of this meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses also showed that omitting 1 study from analysis did not change the conclusion of this meta-analysis.
Conclusions: On the basis of this meta-analysis of RCTs, aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer solution is an effective and safe therapy for prophylaxis of PEP.
Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Author Keywords: | endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; lactated ringer solution; pancreatitis.
|
References: | 1. Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:845-864.
2. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:143-149.
3. Jin S, Orabi AI, Le T, et al. Exposure to radiocontrast agents induces pancreatic inflammation by activation of nuclear factor-[kappa]B, calcium signaling, and calcineurin. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:753-764.
4. Hackert T, Werner J, Gebhard MM, et al. Effects of heparin in experimental models of acute pancreatitis and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surgery. 2004;135:131-138.
5. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1400-1415.
6. Lankisch PG, Apte M, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2015;386:85-96.
7. Buxbaum J, Yan A, Yeh K, et al. Aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer's solution reduces pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:303-307.
8. Choi JH, Kim HJ, Lee BU, et al. Vigorous periprocedural hydration with lactated Ringer's solution reduces the risk of pancreatitis after retrograde cholangiopancreatography in hospitalized patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. pii: S1542-3565(16)30304-4.
9. Chang AS, Pausawasdi N, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of aggressive fluid hydration for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:S209.
10. Chuankrerkkul P. Aggressive lactated Ringer's solution for prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis (preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:AB410-AB411.
11. Smeets XJ, da Costa DW, Besselink MG, et al. Systematic review: periprocedural hydration in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44:541-553.
12. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. 2011.The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Accessed June 30, 2011.
13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
15. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected bya simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997;315:629-634.
16. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1046-1055.
17. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010. Available at: http://www.R-project.org- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:395-400.
19. Shaygan-Nejad A, Masjedizadeh AR, Ghavidel A, et al. Aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer's solution as the prophylactic intervention for post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Res Med Sci. 2015;20:838-843.
20. Rosa B, Carvalho PB, De Castro FD, et al. Impact of intensive hydration on the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis: double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:AB250.
21. Choi JH, Kim HJ, Lee BU, et al. Vigorous periprocedural hydration with lactated Ringer solution reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:AB138-AB139.
22. Buxbaum JL, Yan AW, Yeh K, et al. A prospective randomized trial of aggressive hydration to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:AB158.
23. NorthShore University Health System, Medical College of Wisconsin, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Advocate Health Care, University of Utah. High volume lactated Ringer's solution and pancreatitis. National Library of Medicine (US), 2016. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre Accessed June 26, 2016.
24. Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL, et al. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:385-393.
25. Gukovsky I, Pandol SJ, Mareninova OA, et al. Impaired autophagy and organellar dysfunction in pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(suppl 2):27-32.
26. Dawra R, Sah RP, Dudeja V, et al. Intra-acinar trypsinogen activation mediates early stages of pancreatic injury but not inflammation in mice with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:2210-2217.
27. Kim JY, Kim KH, Lee JA, et al. Transporter-mediated bile acid uptake causes Ca2+-dependent cell death in rat pancreatic acinar cells. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1941-1953.
28. Perides G, Laukkarinen JM, Vassileva G, et al. Biliary acute pancreatitis in mice is mediated by the G-protein-coupled cell surface bile acid receptor Gpbar1. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:715-725.
29. Geyer N, Diszhazi G, Csernoch L, et al. Bile acids activate ryanodine receptors in pancreatic acinar cells via a direct allosteric mechanism. Cell Calcium. 2015;58:160-170.
30. Perides G, van Acker GJ, Laukkarinen JM, et al. Experimental acute biliary pancreatitis induced by retrograde infusion of bile acids into the mouse pancreatic duct. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:335-341.
31. Perez S, Pereda J, Sabater L, et al. Redox signaling in acute pancreatitis. Redox Biol. 2015;5:1-14.
32. Muddana V, Whitcomb DC, Khalid A, et al. Elevated serum creatinine as a marker of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:164-170.
33. Wu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, et al. Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:710-717.
34. Seyama Y, Otani T, Matsukura A, et al. The pH modulator chloroquine blocks trypsinogen activation peptide generation in cerulein-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2003;26:15-17.
35. Noble MD, Romac J, Vigna SR, et al. A pH-sensitive, neurogenic pathway mediates disease severity in a model of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut. 2008;57:1566-1571.
36. Kellum JA, Song M, Li J. Lactic and hydrochloric acids induce different patterns of inflammatory response in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004;286:R686-R692.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | ONLINE ARTICLE: Original Article.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine. Health Professions.
|
ISSN: | 0192-0790
|
NLM Journal Code: | ibg, 7910017
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|