Ten years of data for the rural-based Trover Campus (ULTC) were compared with data for the main campus of the University of Louisville School of Medicine to determine whether educational outcomes were equivalent and whether this method of optimizing the affinity model was effective in placing graduates in rural practice.Method
Demographic data and academic measures were compared for 1,391 graduates (60 from ULTC) for 2001–2010. A noninferiority model was developed to compare clinical experiences for each campus cohort. Residency match lists were examined for specialty choice. Graduates from 2001 to 2006 were matched to the American Medical Association Masterfile to determine practice site.Results
ULTC students scored lower on United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Skills (CK) but tended to close this gap after clinical training when compared with Louisville graduates. The noninferiority model indicates that ULTC students’ scores were noninferior to Louisville students’ on adjusted shelf exams for obstetrics–gynecology, pediatrics, and surgery, and Step 2 CK (P < .001). ULTC graduates were 4.5 times more likely to choose family medicine (P < .001) and over 6 times more likely to choose a nonmetropolitan area as a practice site (P = .001).Conclusions
These data support the value of a small regional rural clinical campus in optimizing the affinity model to place rural students into rural practice. The ULTC students showed equivalent adjusted test scores and slightly narrowed the gap in unadjusted USMLE scores compared with the main campus students.