Quality of life outcomes of combination zidovudine–didanosine–nevirapine and zidovudine–didanosine for antiretroviral-naive advanced HIV-infected patients


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality of life outcomes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to zidovudine plus didanosine versus zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine for treatment of advanced HIV disease (the Istituto Superiore di Sanità 047 trial).DesignA 48-week randomized, double-blind trial.MethodsSixty patients were enrolled and evaluated over 24 weeks. Quality of life was assessed using a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey. For analysis, we calculated two summary scores reflecting the physical (PHS) and the mental (MHS) components of health.ResultsAlthough the three-drug combination was superior at inducing immunologic and virologic responses, the two-drug regimen was superior for both PHS and MHS, especially at week 8 where differences were both statistically and clinically significant (5.8 and 9.2 points, respectively, P < 0.02 for both). Quality of life changes paralleled trends in body weight and Karnofsky performance status score.ConclusionAlthough a three-drug antiretroviral therapy regimen was superior in terms of short term virologic/immunologic response, the two-drug regimen was better in terms of quality of life. In general, triple therapy remains the most effective treatment option. However, quality of life assessments can yield results that may be discordant with and complementary to those obtained using conventional endpoints. Comparative trials should collect a comprehensive range of outcome measures, including patient-reported quality of life, in order to provide clinicians and patients with additional information that may influence treatment decisions.

    loading  Loading Related Articles