Screening for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background:

Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus could lead to earlier identification and treatment of asymptomatic diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), potentially resulting in improved outcomes.

Purpose:

To update the 2008 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on diabetes screening in adults.

Data Sources:

Cochrane databases and MEDLINE (2007 through October 2014) and relevant studies from previous Task Force reviews.

Study Selection:

Randomized, controlled trials; controlled, observational studies; and systematic reviews.

Data Extraction:

Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and checked by a second; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality.

Data Synthesis:

In 2 trials, screening for diabetes was associated with no 10-year mortality benefit versus no screening (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.25]). Sixteen trials consistently found that treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes. Most trials of treatment of IFG or IGT found no effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, although lifestyle modification was associated with decreased risk for both outcomes after 23 years in 1 trial. For screen-detected diabetes, 1 trial found no effect of an intensive multifactorial intervention on risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality versus standard control. In diabetes that was not specifically screen-detected, 9 systematic reviews found that intensive glucose control did not reduce risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and results for intensive blood pressure control were inconsistent.

Limitation:

The review was restricted to English-language articles, and few studies were conducted in screen-detected populations.

Conclusion:

Screening for diabetes did not improve mortality rates after 10 years of follow-up. More evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of treatments for screen-detected diabetes. Treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes.

Primary Funding Source:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles