Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Versus Without Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid



To assess the clinical significance of preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in comparison with IMA ligation in surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal (colorectal) cancer.


Consecutive patients (n=862) with colorectal cancer who underwent intended surgical resection of the main tumor between 1986 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: IMA preserved (n=745) and IMA ligated (n=117).


No significant difference was observed in incidence of advanced stage III or IV disease between the 2 groups (P=0.56 and 0.51, respectively), whereas a longer operation time (287 [95 to 700] vs. 215 [60 to 900] min, respectively; P<0.001) and greater amount of intraoperative bleeding (595 [15 to 4530] vs. 235 [1 to 11565] mL, respectively; P<0.001) were observed in the IMA-ligated group. The overall incidence of surgery-related complications was higher in the IMA-ligated group than in the IMA-preserved group (53.0% vs. 38.5%, respectively; P=0.003). Urinary dysfunction and abdominal abscess were significantly more frequent in the IMA-ligated group (11.1% vs. 4.0%, P=0.001; and 6.8% vs. 2.6%, P=0.01, respectively), and postoperative hospitalization was longer (11 to 140, median 28 vs. 5 to 153, median 19 d, respectively; P<0.001). No significant difference was found in overall survival rate between the 2 groups.


For colorectal cancer resection, IMA preservation may be no change to IMA ligation as to patient’ survival, with small risk of operative morbidity.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles