The Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Monitoring in the Prevention of Recurrent Variceal Hemorrhage

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent variceal hemorrhage is common following an initial bleed in patients with cirrhosis. The current standard of care for secondary prophylaxis is endoscopic band ligation (EBL). Combination of β-blocker and nitrate therapy, guided by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) monitoring, is a novel alternative strategy. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of these competing strategies.

METHODS

Decision analysis with Markov modeling was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of three competing strategies: (1) EBL; (2) β-blocker and nitrate therapy without HVPG monitoring (HVPG−); and (3) β-blocker and nitrate therapy with HVPG monitoring (HVPG+). Patients in the HVPG+ strategy who failed to achieve an HVPG decline from medical therapy were offered EBL. Cost estimates were from a third-party payer perspective. The main outcome measure was the cost per recurrent variceal hemorrhage prevented.

RESULTS

Under base-case conditions, the HVPG+ strategy was the most effective yet most expensive approach, followed by EBL and HVPG−. Compared to the EBL strategy, the HVPG+ strategy cost an incremental $5,974 per recurrent bleed prevented. In a population with 100% compliance with all therapies, the incremental cost of HVPG− versus EBL fell to $5,270 per recurrent bleed prevented. The model results were sensitive to the cost of EBL, the cost of HVPG monitoring, and the probability of medical therapy producing an adequate HVPG decline.

RESULTS

Compared to EBL for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding, combination medical therapy guided by HVPG monitoring is more effective and only marginally more expensive.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles