Human Papillomavirus is Not an Etiologic Agent of Urothelial Inverted Papillomas

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Inverted papilloma of the urinary bladder is rare, accounting for <1% of all bladder neoplasms. Although there is general consensus that inverted papilloma is benign in nature, little is known about its pathogenesis. Some have suggested that human papillomavirus (HPV) plays an etiologic role in the development of this neoplasm. These claims have not been adequately substantiated, and there is controversy as to the role of HPV in other urinary bladder neoplasms as well. To further investigate a possible etiologic role of HPV in urothelial neoplasia, we evaluated 27 inverted papillomas of the urinary bladder for the presence of HPV. Both immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization (ISH) studies for HPV and immunohistochemical analysis for p16, a surrogate marker for HPV infection, were used to assess HPV infection status. In the urinary bladder inverted papillomas of these 27 patients (age range, 35 to 78 y; M:F ratio, 11:1), no HPV was detected by HPV immunohistochemistry or by ISH. Immunoreactivity to p16 was detected in 11/27 (41%) of the cases. Expression of p16 is seen inconsistently within these neoplasms and does not correlate with the presence of HPV antigens or genes by immunohistochemistry or ISH, respectively. Therefore, p16 is not a reliable surrogate marker for HPV infection in urothelial inverted papilloma. Our findings indicate the absence of HPV in urothelial inverted papillomas. HPV testing should not be used as a diagnostic adjunct for inverted papilloma cases.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles