Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Transplantation in Relation to Type of End-Stage Pulmonary Disease

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between diagnosis and the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of lung transplantation.

A microsimulation model was used, based on empirical data from the Dutch lung transplantation program, collected between 1991 and 1999. We assessed life-years, quality-adjusted life-years, and costs with and without transplantation for the diagnostic categories alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency, COPD/emphysema, bronchiectasis, primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension, cystic fibrosis, and pulmonary fibrosis.

Alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency and bronchiectasis had the highest survival gain. Secondary pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary fibrosis had the lowest survival gain and the lowest gain of quality-adjusted life-years. As compared with COPD/emphysema, alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency, bronchiectasis, and CF had 25%, 40% and 19% more favorable cost-effectiveness ratios, respectively. Cost-utility ratios varied less, with values of −7%, −14% and −11% for alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency, bronchiectasis, and primary pulmonary hypertension, respectively, compared with COPD.

In conclusion, our model suggests that there is considerable variation in cost-effectiveness and, to a lesser degree, in cost-utility between the different diagnostic categories. These variations are the result of differences in survival and in quality of life with and without lung transplantation.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles