High sensitivity of specific genotypic tools for detection of X4 variants in antiretroviral-experienced patients suitable to be treated with CCR5 antagonists


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

ObjectivesEvaluation of the reliability of several V3-based genotypic predictors to infer viral tropism in patients infected with B and non-B strains of HIV-1.MethodsSeveral genotypic tropism predictors were evaluated in plasma (RNA) samples from 198 HIV-1-infected patients, taking as gold standard the results of the phenotypic recombinant virus assay Phenoscript®. In addition, for 37 B subtype HIV-1 patients the phenotypic results from plasma samples were also compared with tropism predictions based on V3 amplification from paired peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).ResultsA total of 150 paired genotypic/phenotypic results were obtained from plasma specimens. Concordance values ranged from 63% to 85%, depending on the genotypic algorithm used. The best predictors in terms of sensitivity/specificity to detect X4 variants were WebPSSMX4/R5 (77%/87%), Geno2phenoFPR=5% (80%/77%) and an algorithm combining the ‘11/25’ and ‘Net charge’ rules, termed Garrido's rule (80%/79%). The performance of genotypic predictors was better testing B than non-B clades. The overall sensitivity ranged from 28% to 94%, reaching 100% in subtype B antiretroviral-experienced patients using WebPSSMSI/NSI, Geno2phenoFPR5% and Garrido's rule. Conversely, the sensitivity when testing non-B subtypes was poorer, ranging from 17% to 67%. Interestingly, the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic results was better when testing PBMCs than plasma using all genotypic predictors.ConclusionsGenotypic tools based on V3 sequences may provide reliable information on HIV-1 tropism when testing clade B viruses, especially in antiretroviral-experienced patients. The sensitivity to detect X4 variants using genotypic tools may improve by testing proviral DNA instead of plasma RNA.

    loading  Loading Related Articles