“Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Orders and the Anesthesiologist: A Survey


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Anesthesiologists were surveyed to determine their experience and opinions regarding “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) orders in the perioperative period. Four hundred fifteen questionnaires were mailed and 193 (47%) were returned. One hundred sixty-one (87%) of 186 respondents had been requested to provide (and more than two-thirds had provided) monitored anesthesia care, regional anesthesia, or general anesthesia to a patient with a DNR order. Almost two-thirds of the respondents assume DNR suspension in the perioperative period and only half discuss this assumption with the patient/guardian. Less than 50% of respondents would require DNR suspension for a palliative procedure contrasted with >60% for an elective procedure. After agreeing to a patient's decision to retain their DNR status, >67%, >58%, <49%, and <33% would utilize positive pressure ventilation with a mask, vasoactive drugs, endotracheal intubation, or defibrillation, respectively, in the event of a cardiopulmonary arrest in the perioperative period. These findings suggest much ambiguity regarding DNR orders in the perioperative period. Further discussion among physicians and patients is warranted.(Anesth Analg 1993;76:394-401)

    loading  Loading Related Articles