Effect of propofol anaesthesia on the event-related potential mismatch negativity and the auditory-evoked potential N1


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

BackgroundStudies on the effects of anaesthesia on event-related potentials and long latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) are sparse. Both provide information on cortical processing and may have potential as monitors of awareness. We studied the effect of propofol on the event-related potential mismatch negativity (MMN) and the long-latency AEP N1.MethodsTwenty-one patients received 1 µg ml–1 stepped increases in the target concentration of propofol using Diprifusor™ until a maximum of 6 µg ml–1 was achieved or the patient had lost consciousness. Neurophysiological responses (MMN and N1) and the patients’ level of consciousness were recorded before the administration of propofol and at a target effector site concentration of propofol of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 µg ml–1. Grand average evoked potentials were computed at baseline, before the administration of propofol (A); at the highest propofol concentration at which each patient was responsive (B); and at the concentration of propofol at which the patient became unconscious (C).ResultsPatients lost consciousness at different target concentrations of propofol, all being unresponsive by 4 µg ml–1. The response to the deviant stimuli used to elicit duration-shift MMN was significantly more negative than to the standard stimuli at A (mean difference 2.58 µV, P=0.0011) but this difference was virtually abolished at point B, before the patients lost consciousness (mean difference 0.63 µV, P=ns). The amplitude of N1 evoked by standard stimuli was negative compared with electrical baseline at both point A (mean amplitude –3.81 µV, P<0.001) and at point B (mean amplitude –2.2 µV, P=0.002), but was no longer significantly different to baseline at point C (mean amplitude 0.51 µV, P=ns). The change in the mean amplitude of N1 from last awake (point B) to first unconscious (point C) was also significant (mean difference in amplitude 1.69 µV, P=0.02).ConclusionsMMN is unlikely to be a clinically useful tool to detect awareness in surgical patients. In contrast, the loss of N1 may identify the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness and deserves further study.

    loading  Loading Related Articles