Randomized comparative multicenter study of hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin as a plasma expander in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites treated with paracentesis

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


ObjectiveLarge-volume paracentesis associated with plasma volume expansion with albumin is an effective, safe, but costly therapy for ascites in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the use of a synthetic plasma expander, hydroxyethyl starch (HES), with that of albumin.DesignSixty cirrhotic patients with ascites were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to be infused with either albumin (8 g/l of ascites removed, n = 33) or HES (200 ml/I of ascites removed, n = 27). None of the patients was treated with diuretics or had renal impairment or hyponatremia at entry. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained before and 1, 3 and 15 days after treatmentResultsThere were no significant differences in clinical and laboratory parameters between the two groups at entry into the study. None of the patients developed renal impairment during the trial. One patient (HES group) presented with hyponatremia. Plasma atrial natriuretic factor and aldosterone levels did not differ between the two groups at baseline or at 1 and 3 days after paracentesis. The volume of ascites removed did not differ between the albumin (7.9 ± 4.41) and HES (6.9 ± 5.3 I) groups. However, there was a significant difference in weight loss between the albumin and HES groups (7.9 ± 5.2 kg vs 4.7 ± 3.4 kg; p = 0.01). Clinical and laboratory parameters indicated that HES was well tolerated except for hypoalbuminemia.ConclusionHES is well tolerated in patients with cirrhosis. There is no difference between HES and albumin in the prevention of complications related to large-volume paracentesis. The lesser degree of weight loss observed with HES needs further study.

    loading  Loading Related Articles