Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam/propofol or midazolam/fentanyl for conscious sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background

Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is an established technique for the management of patients with difficult airways. A number of drugs have been described to provide sedation for this procedure. Benzodiazepines combined with opioids or propofol are commonly used agents. Recently, dexmedetomidine has emerged as an ideal sedative during AFOI.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as a sole sedative versus the conventionally used propofol/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam combinations during AFOI.

Patients and methods

Seventy-five patients with anticipated difficult airways who required tracheal intubation for elective surgery were enrolled and randomly allocated to one of three groups: group D (n=25) received a dexmedetomidine infusion, group PM (n=25) received a propofol/midazolam combination, and group FM (n=25) received a fentanyl/midazolam combination. The main outcome measures were fiberoptic intubating conditions and patient tolerance, which were graded using multiple scoring systems. Other parameters including hemodynamic (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) and respiratory changes were recorded.

Results

All the scores that quantified patient tolerability and the fiberoptic intubating conditions were significantly better in group D than both groups PM and FM. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate decreased significantly during sedation in group D and group PM. Meanwhile, there was considerable hemodynamic stability in both group D and PM during intubation. The dexmedetomidine group showed more favorable respiratory changes than the other two groups.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine alone appears to be a more suitable agent for sedation during AFOI compared with either propofol/midazolam or fentanyl/midazolam combinations.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles