The signalling role of action potential depolarization in insulin secretion: Metabolism-dependent dissociation between action potential increase and secretion increase by TEA


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Graphical abstractWhen KATP channels are closed in the absence of glucose TEA still blocks Kv channels and increases cytosolic Ca2+, but inhibits insulin secretion. This cannot be overcome by Bay K8644.The K+ channel blocker, TEA is known to increase action potential amplitude and insulin secretion of mouse β-cells when added to a nutrient secretagogue. In the presence of a maximally effective sulfonylurea concentration (2.7 μM glipizide) the nutrient secretagogue α-ketoisocaproic acid (KIC, 10 mM) strongly increased insulin secretion (about elevenfold). Instead of enhancing the effect of KIC, TEA reduced the KIC-induced secretion by more than 50%. Also, the secretion rate produced by 2.7 μM glipizide alone was significantly reduced by TEA. In contrast, TEA enhanced the insulinotropic effect of glipizide when a basal glucose concentration (5 mM) was present. In the presence as well as in the absence of glucose glipizide produced a plateau depolarization with superimposed action potentials. Under both conditions, TEA increased the glipizide-induced action potential amplitude and further elevated the cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) with an oscillatory characteristic. These effects depended on the activity of L-type Ca2+ channels, even though the effect of TEA differed from that of 1 μM of the Ca2+ channel opener, Bay K8644, which primarily increased action potential duration. TEA did not negatively affect parameters of β-cell energy metabolism (NAD(P)H fluorescence and ATP/ADP ratio), rather, it slightly increased NAD(P)H fluorescence. Apparently, TEA inhibits insulin secretion in the absence of glucose in spite of a persistent ability to block K+ ion conductance. Thus, the signalling role of action potential depolarization in insulin secretion may require reconsideration and ion conductance-independent actions of K+ channels may be involved in this paradox effect of TEA.

    loading  Loading Related Articles