Capnogram slope and ventilation dead space parameters: comparison of mainstream and sidestream techniques

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background

Capnography may provide useful non-invasive bedside information concerning heterogeneity in lung ventilation, ventilation–perfusion mismatching and metabolic status. Although the capnogram may be recorded by mainstream and sidestream techniques, the capnogram indices furnished by these approaches have not previously been compared systematically.

Methods

Simultaneous mainstream and sidestream time and volumetric capnography was performed in anaesthetized, mechanically ventilated patients undergoing elective heart surgery. Time capnography was used to assess the phase II (SII,T) and III slopes (SIII,T). The volumetric method was applied to estimate phase II (SII,V) and III slopes (SIII,V), together with the dead space values according to the Fowler (VDF), Bohr (VDB), and Enghoff (VDE) methods and the volume of CO2 eliminated per breath (

Methods

JOURNAL/bjant/04.02/00002264-201607000-00016/math_16MM1/v/2017-08-19T024219Z/r/image-png

Methods

). The partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (

Methods

JOURNAL/bjant/04.02/00002264-201607000-00016/math_16MM2/v/2017-08-19T024219Z/r/image-png

Methods

) was registered.

Results

Excellent correlation and good agreement were observed in SIII,T measured by the mainstream and sidestream techniques [ratio=1.05 (SEM 0.16), R2=0.92, P<0.0001]. Although the sidestream technique significantly underestimated

Results

JOURNAL/bjant/04.02/00002264-201607000-00016/math_16MM3/v/2017-08-19T024219Z/r/image-png

Results

and overestimated SIII,V [1.32 (0.28), R2=0.93, P<0.0001], VDF, VDB, and VDE, the agreement between the mainstream and sidestream techniques in the difference between VDE and VDB, reflecting the intrapulmonary shunt, was excellent [0.97 (0.004), R2=0.92, P<0.0001]. The

Results

JOURNAL/bjant/04.02/00002264-201607000-00016/math_16MM4/v/2017-08-19T024219Z/r/image-png

Results

exhibited good correlation and mild differences between the mainstream and sidestream approaches [0.025 (0.005) kPa].

Conclusions

Sidestream capnography provides adequate quantitative bedside information about uneven alveolar emptying and ventilation–perfusion mismatching, because it allows reliable assessments of the phase III slope,

Conclusions

JOURNAL/bjant/04.02/00002264-201607000-00016/math_16MM5/v/2017-08-19T024219Z/r/image-png

Conclusions

and intrapulmonary shunt. Reliable measurement of volumetric parameters (phase II slope, dead spaces, and eliminated CO2 volumes) requires the application of a mainstream device.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles