Acenocoumarol vs. low-dose dabigatran in real-world patients discharged after ischemic stroke

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and acenocoumarol in patients with atrial fibrillation discharged after ischemic stroke. We prospectively studied 436 consecutive patients who were discharged after acute ischemic stroke (39.2% males, age 78.6 ± 6.7 years). Approximately 1 year after discharge, the functional status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Adverse outcome was defined as mRS between 2 and 6. The occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death during the 1-year follow-up was also recorded. At discharge, 142 patients had atrial fibrillation. Acenocoumarol and dabigatran 110 mg twice daily were prescribed to 52.1 and 6.3% of these patients, respectively. At 1 year after discharge, there was a trend for patients treated with acenocoumarol to have lower mRS than patients prescribed dabigatran (2.3 ± 2.4 and 4.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.060). Adverse outcome rates and the incidence of stroke during follow-up did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of MI was almost three times higher in patients prescribed dabigatran than in those prescribed acenocoumarol, but this difference did not reach significance (11.1 and 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.254). The incidence of cardiovascular death was also almost three times higher in the former, but again this difference was not significant (33.3 and 12.2%, respectively; P = 0.237). In real-world patients with acute ischemic stroke, dabigatran 110 mg twice daily is as effective as acenocoumarol in preventing stroke but appears to be associated with worse long-term functional outcome and higher incidence of MI.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles