Primary computed tomography survey for major trauma
Treatment of polycystic liver disease
Phaeochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas
Blinded randomized clinical trial of botulinum toxin versus isosorbide dinitrate ointment for treatment of anal fissure
Improving prediction of malignancy of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules
Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial of hospital versus telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer
Advantage of a one-stop referral and management service for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
Endoscopic lumbar sympathectomy for plantar hyperhidrosis
In situ hypothermic liver preservation during radical liver resection with major vascular reconstruction
Multicentre study of the safety of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly
High preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels predict poor clinical outcome after curative resection of gastric cancer
Nationwide study of early outcomes after incisional hernia repair
Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer
PTQ™ anal implants for the treatment of faecal incontinence
Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation by individual and combined administration of 4 per cent icodextrin and dimetindene maleate
Angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in human surgical wounds
Letter 1: Prospective randomized trial using cost–utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1031–1040)
Letter 2: Prospective randomized trial using cost–utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1031–1040)
Authors' reply: Prospective randomized trial using cost–utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1031–1040)
Letter 1: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Letter 2: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Letter 3: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Letter 4: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Letter 5: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Letter 6: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Authors' reply: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer ( Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982–989)
Scientific Surgery
BJS authorship