Medium-term neurological complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with and without aortic manipulation

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess the impact of aortic manipulation during off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) on neurological complications.

Methods and results

Of 336 isolated OPCAB surgeries, the aorta was untouched in 264 cases (group A), whereas it was manipulated by a side-biting clamp in 72 (group B). The average follow-up was 2.9±2.5 years. One patient in each group developed postoperative stroke (P=0.38). The prevalence of triple-vessel disease (group A 40.9% vs. group B 61.1%; P=0.0003) and left main trunk disease (group A 30.7% vs. group B 47.2%; P=0.1) was lower in group A than in group B. The number of bypass grafts (group A 2.18±0.97 vs. group B 3.00±0.97; P=0.0001) was lower in group A than in group B. The prevalence of preoperative atrial fibrillation and the incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation were not different between groups (P=0.74 and 0.86, respectively). Survival rate and freedom from major adverse cardiac events were not different between groups (P=0.87 and 0.51, respectively). However, freedom from neurological complications was significantly lower in group A (P=0.0006). The Cox hazard model showed that aortic manipulation (P=0.004; odds ratio, 6.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.8–21.6) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (P=0.001; odds ratio, 14.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.7–72.5) were risk factors for neurological complications.

Conclusion

Although there was no difference in the incidence of immediate postoperative neurological complications, there were fewer medium-term neurological complications in OPCAB cases without aortic manipulation.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles