Abstract 7: Health Care System Re-Design to Achieve Universal Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Services

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


Background: The efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) is well established, and completion of such programs after an event is standard-of-care in guidelines worldwide. Despite universal recommendations, participation in CRP is alarmingly low: estimated at 14%-35% in the US, and <15% of eligible patients in the Canadian province of Ontario. The inability to achieve even 50% participation in CRP represents a failure of health care systems (HCS) to deliver effective, high-quality services. Such a failure is particularly vexing in Canada, where the central tenet and legal requirement of the HC-S is universal access to all medically necessary services.

Objectives: A team of health care providers and administrators in Ontario used a systems integration approach to re-design the HCS in one health care region (HCR) to make an evidence-based CRP universally available. The key features of this HCS-integrated CRP (HCS-I-CRP), its adoption, and population health impact are reported here.

Methods: By design, the HCS-I-CRP included harmonized criteria that triggered automatic referral to a HCR-wide coordinating center, which then directed eligible patients to a CRP provided in local, community-based setting (LCB-CRP). Fourteen LCB-CRP, available within a 30-minute drive from most all locations in the HCR, were trained to provide a standardized CRP. Detailed patient outcomes were tracked in a centralized database. Using administrative data, within-HCR participation rates were monitored, and population level health impacts between the HCR implementing the HCS-I-CRP and all other HCRs in Ontario were compared for the 2 years prior and 1 year after the HCS-I-CRP implementation.

Results: More than 11,000 patients were referred through the HCS-I-CRP to a LCB-CRP. The estimated overall participation and completion rates were 31% and 67%, respectively. Population health impacts in the HCR implementing the HCS-I-CRP included (p<0.05): larger HCR-wide reduction in visits to family practitioners, cardiologists, and internists for any cardiac reason; larger HCR-wide reductions in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and visits to cardiologist and internists for acute coronary syndrome; and larger HCR-wide reductions in visits to family practitioners and cardiologists for heart failure. Reductions in HCR-wide mortality for acute coronary syndrome approached significance (p=0.097).

Conclusions: The adoption of a HCS-I-CRP was extremely successful: referrals actually exceeded the capacity of LCB-CRPs and enrollment, unfortunately, had to be capped. Despite this, statistically significant, population level health benefits were observed. We anticipate that adoption of a province-wide HCS-I-CRP, initiated and buttressed by provincial policy, would achieve near universal access to CRP and population health benefits similar to or greater than those reported here.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles