Abstract 173: Coronary artery aneurysm measurement and z-score variability in Kawasaki Disease

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery (CA) z-scores are commonly used for clinical decisions in Kawasaki disease (KD). We evaluated reliability in CA measurement, reproducibility of z-score calculation, and frequency with which different z-score formulas lead to divergent management strategies.

Methods: We randomly selected 21 KD patients (pts) with ≥1 CA z-score 1.5-3 and all KD pts with ≥ 1 CA z-score 7-14 (n=20). Two echocardiographers measured LMCA, LAD and RCA. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated. T-tests were used to compare CA z-score using 3 commonly used formulas (Boston, DC and Montreal).

Results: Median age at KD echo was 1.2 y (0.2-11.5 y). Interobserver reliability was high for LAD (intraclass correlation [ICC] 0.970) and RCA (ICC 0.943) and lower for LMCA (ICC 0.725). Intraobserver reliability was also high for LAD and RCA (ICC 0.991 and 0.999) and lower for LMCA (ICC 0.946). Z-scores for the 3 formulas were similar at smaller CA size, i.e., z < 3, but varied markedly at larger CA dimensions (Figure). Z-scores for the same CA dimension calculated by each of the 3 formulas resulted in disparate classification of normal vs. mild dilation in 7/21 (22%) pts, and different guidance for anticoagulation based on CA z ≥10 in 10/20 (50%) pts.

Conclusion: Although CA measurements have high inter- and intraobserver agreement, CA z-scores vary dramatically based on the z-score formula, particularly at larger CA dimensions. Discrepancies in CA z-score between calculators impacts not only the distinction between normal and mild dilatation, but most importantly, the recommendation of anticoagulation for pts with larger CA dimensions.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles