Abstract 20382: Comparison of Outcomes After Rhythm or Rate Control Strategy for the New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients Managed in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Introduction: Data regarding effective rhythm or rate management for new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in critically ill sepsis patients managed in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) are sparse.

Hypothesis: We tried to compare the outcomes after rhythm or rate control strategy in these patients.

Methods: A total of 5,383 sepsis patients were managed in MICU of Asan Medical Center from 2007 through 2015. Among these patients, 482 experienced new-onset AF, and the medical records of them (mean 68.2 years old, 68.9% male, median CHADS2VASC score 3, median APACHEII score 24) were reviewed. After exclusion of 34 patients who underwent urgent electrical cardioversion, patients were divided into two groups (rhythm control, 43.5%; rate control group, 56.7%) according to the initial management strategy. The main outcomes of the current study were rate of mortality, thromboembolism, and sinus conversion at 28 days after AF onset.

Results: ICU interventions such as mechanical ventilator, inotropics or vasopressor, and renal replacement treatment were applied in 84.5%, 59.9%, and 26.8% of the patients at the time of AF onset. Amiodarone was predominantly used as a rhythm control measure (95.4%). After propensity matching, patients managed by rhythm control strategy showed higher sinus conversion rate compared to those with rate control strategy (39.8% vs. 19.8%, p<0.001). However, mortality rate (54.9% vs. 49.3%, p=0.529) or thromboembolic events (5.5% vs. 7.6%, p=0.635) were not different between the two groups.

Conclusions: Early rhythm control strategy could facilitate the sinus conversion. However, it did not provide additional benefits over rate control strategy in terms of hard outcomes.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles