Biomechanics of anterior plating failure in treating distractive flexion injury in the caudal subaxial cervical spine

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


Background:Operative level is a potential biomechanical risk factor for construct failure during anterior fixation for distractive flexion injury. No biomechanical study of this concept has been reported, although it is important in clinical management.Methods:To explore the mechanism of this concept, a previously validated three-dimensional C2-T1 finite element model was modified to simulate surgical procedure via the anterior approach for treating single-level distractive flexion injury, from C2-C3 to C7-T1. Four loading conditions were used including no-compression, follower load, axial load, and combined load. Construct stability at the operative level was assessed.Findings:Under these loading conditions with the head's weight simulated, segmental stability decreases when the operative level shifts cephalocaudally, especially at C6-C7 and C7-T1, the stress of screw-bone interface increases cephalocaudally, and in the same operative level, the caudal screws always carries more load than the cephalad ones. All these predicted results are consistent with failure patterns observed in clinical reports. In the contrast, under other loading conditions without the weight of head, no obvious segmental divergence was predicted.Interpretation:This study supports that the biomechanical mechanism of this phenomenon includes eccentric load from head weight during sagittal movements and difference of moment arms. Our study suggests that anterior fixation is not recommended for treating distractive flexion injury at the caudal segments of the subaxial cervical spine, especially at C6-C7 and C7-T1, because of the intrinsic instability in these segments. Combined posterior rigid fixation with anterior fixation should be considered for these segments.HighlightsIn distractive flexion injury, operative level may cause anterior fixation failureHowever, no biomechanical study investigating this possibility has been reportedA validated three-dimensional C2-T1 model was used to test the hypothesisSegmental stability decreased cephalocaudally, especially at C6-C7 and C7-T1Anterior fixation seems unsuitable for C6-T1 in this context

    loading  Loading Related Articles