To assess the efficacy and safety of cross-linking in pediatric patients with keratoconus and to provide a systematic literature overview regarding this subject.Methods:
In this prospective cohort, 54 eyes of 36 pediatric patients with keratoconus underwent standard epithelium-off cross-linking. Follow-up measurements taken up to 5 years after treatment were compared with baseline values. Logistic regression was used to identify the underlying cause in case of progression despite treatment. Finally, a systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase, and data were extracted and summarized.Results:
At all follow-up visits up to 5 years, maximum keratometry values improved significantly (mean change at 5 years −2.06 diopters (D), P = 0.01); moreover, average keratometry, uncorrected distance visual acuity, and corrected distance visual acuity improved at all follow-up times, though not always to the level of statistical significance. In 12 eyes (22%), keratoconus had progressed by ≥1.0 D by the last follow-up visit, despite corneal cross-linking. Cones that were more decentralized were identified as the underlying cause of disease progression. The systematic search yielded 17 unique articles: 10 articles on epithelium-off cross-linking, 2 on accelerated cross-linking, 2 on transepithelial cross-linking, 1 on both epithelium-off and transepithelial cross-linking, and 2 on transepithelial cross-linking with iontophoresis.Conclusions:
Our long-term follow-up reveals that epithelium-off cross-linking is both apparently safe and effective when used to prevent keratoconus progression in pediatric patients. However, disease progression occurred in 22% of the treated eyes; this progression was attributed to a more decentralized cone location.