|| Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid
To validate the Geggel ratio (GR) and consensus group in myopic excimer laser patients undergoing cataract surgery.Two separate consecutively collected case series (group 1, 32 eyes; group 2, 34 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. Data from group 1 was used to generate a new linear regression formula for the GR based on the Haigis formula. Predicted implant powers based on the Shammas, Latkany, Savini, Seitz, Haigis-L, and GR based on either SRK/T or Haigis formulas and combined consensus methods were computed. Mean error, range, percent within ±0.5 D, ±1.0 D and −1.0/+0.5 D were calculated.In group 1, the original GR (SRK/T) formula produced higher mean values (−0.44 D) and lower percentage within ±0.5 D (41%) compared with the other 5 formulas (−0.03 to −0.33 D; 65%–82%). A linear regression formula (−0.142*ΔSE +0.2) for the GR was derived as a correction factor added to the Haigis formula. Group 2 validated the 5 formulas again plus the GR (Haigis). All group 2 formulas gave excellent results with means ranging from −0.18 to −0.37 D, percentages with ±0.5 D ranging from 55% to 78%, and percentages within −1.0/+0.5 D ranging from 85% to 100%. Consensus formulas produced mean error −0.30 D, 70% ±0.5 D, 93% −1.0/+0.5 D with only 2 outliers at 0.6 D and −1.1 D.These six methods achieve high levels of IOL accuracy. The GR method works better based on the Haigis formula. Consensus calculations minimize both under- and overcorrections.