Study of Three Different Doses of Epidural Neostigmine Coadministered with Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background

Intrathecal neostigmine produces analgesia in volunteers and patients. However, the use of epidural neostigmine has not been investigated. The purpose of the current study was to define the analgesic effectiveness of epidural neostigmine coadministered with lidocaine and side effects in patients after minor orthopedic procedures.

Methods

After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, 48 patients (n = 12) undergoing knee surgery were randomly allocated to one of four groups and studied in a prospective way. After 0.05-0.1 mg/kg intravenous midazolam premedication, patients were randomized to receive 20 mg intrathecal bupivacaine plus epidural lidocaine (85 mg) with saline (control group); 1 [micro sign]g/kg epidural neostigmine (1 [micro sign]g group); 2 [micro sign]g kg epidural neostigmine (2 [micro sign]g group); or 4 [micro sign]g/kg epidural neostigmine (4 [micro sign]g group). The concept of the visual analog scale, which consisted of a 10-cm line with 0 equaling "no pain at all" and 10 equaling "the worst possible pain" was introduced. Post-operatively, pain was assessed using the visual analog scale, and intramuscular 75 mg diclofenac was available at patient request.

Results

Groups were demographically the same and did not differ in intraoperative characteristics (blood pressure, heart rate, ephedrine consumption, oxyhemoglobin saturation, sensory loss before start of surgery, or duration of sensory motor block). The visual analog scale score at first rescue analgesic and the incidence of adverse effects were similar among groups (P > 0.05). The time (min +/- SD) to first rescue analgesic was as follows: control group: 205 +/- 48; 1-[micro sign]g group: 529 +/- 314; 2-[micro sign]g group: 504 +/- 284; 4-[micro sign]g group: 547 +/- 263 (P < 0.05). The analgesic consumption (number of intramuscular diclofenac injections [mean, 25th-75th percentile]) in 24 h was as follows: control group: 3 [3 or 4]; 1-[micro sign]g group: 1[1 or 2]; 2-[micro sign]g group: 2[1 or 2]; 4-[micro sign]g group: 2[1-3](P < 0.05). The 24-h-pain visual analog scale score (cm +/- SD) that represents the overall impression for the last 24 h was as follows: control group: 5 +/- 1.6; 1-[micro sign]g group: 1.6 +/- 1.8; 2-[micro sign]g group: 1.4 +/- 1.6; 4-[micro sign]g group: 2.2 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.005). The incidence of adverse effects was similar among groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Epidural neostigmine (1, 2, or 4 [micro sign]g/kg) in lidocaine produced a dose-independent analgesic effect ([approximate] 8 h) compared to the control group ([approximate] 3.5 h), and a reduction in postoperative rescue analgesic consumption without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles