Excerpt
Materials and Methods: Forty ASA physical status I-II patients having minor elective orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive LMATM or CobraPLATM. Two of the investigators, all of whom had <2yr clinical anesthesia and hardly experience in LMATM, were selected to insert the airways; these investigators were trained with 5 CobraPLATM and LMATM insertions before the study started. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, and either airway was inserted. We measured insertion time, airway sealing pressure, number of attempts. Postanesthetic complications (bleeding, sore throat, dysphonia, and dysphagia) were also evaluated. Results were presented as means ± SD or actual numbers; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and Discussions: Patients characteristics were almost identical between the two airway groups. Insertion time was significantly shorter with CobraPLATM than LMATM. Airway sealing pressure was significantly greater with CobraPLATM than LMATM. Number of attempts, and postanesthetic complications were similar in both groups.
Conclusion(s): CobraPLATM has better insertion characteristics and airway sealing capabilities than LMATM.