Comparison of Gd(DTPA-BMA) (Omniscan) Versus Gd(HP-DO3A) (ProHance) Relative to Gadolinium Retention in Human Bone Tissue by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


Objective:The objective of this study was to determine the gadolinium (Gd) concentration remaining in human bone tissue after administration of standard clinical doses of 2 Gd-based contrast agents: ProHance and Omniscan.Materials and Methods:After administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd chelate to patients undergoing hip replacement surgery, bone specimens were collected and analyzed, and compared with an age-matched control population without a history of Gd chelate administration. Bone specimens were collected fresh, refrigerated, and subsequently frozen. After grinding and freeze-drying, tissue digestion was performed using Teflon bombs and concentrated nitric acid. A method for analysis of Gd in bone specimens was developed and validated using inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS).Results:Results were compared with a previous study using a different technique for analysis of the same tissue specimens. Tissue retention was 1.77 ± 0.704 μg Gd/g bone (n = 9) for Omniscan and 0.477 ± 0.271 μg Gd/g bone (n = 10) for ProHance measured by ICP-MS. These findings confirmed results from the previous ICP-AES study.Conclusion:Omniscan (Gd[DTPA-BMA]) left approximately 4 times (previous study 2.5 times) more Gd behind in bone than did ProHance (Gd[HP-DO3A]).

    loading  Loading Related Articles