Comparative Fixation of Tibial Plateau Fractures Using α-BSM™, a Calcium Phosphate Cement, Versus Cancellous Bone Graft

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objectives:

To compare the compressive strength of a bone substitute material (α-BSM™) to cancellous bone when used to fill a defect void in a cadaver model of a Schatzker II split depression fracture of the lateral tibial plateau.

Design:

Randomized, paired design.

Setting:

Biomedical engineering laboratory.

Patients:

Twenty-six human tibias were harvested from 13 cadavers. Three pairs of tibia fractured during preparation and were excluded. The remaining 10 matched pairs were randomized to fixation by using the bone substitute material or cancellous bone.

Intervention:

A split depression fracture of the lateral tibial plateau was created in each tibia by using reproducible methods. This fracture was stabilized with a stainless steel L-plate and screws and either α-BSM™ or cancellous bone to fill the defect void.

Main Outcome Measurements:

Stiffness of the elevated fragment in compression, total depression of the joint at 1000 N.

Results:

The α-BSM™ bone substitute displayed significantly greater stiffness than cancellous bone constructs in Schatzker II split depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau (P < 0.0001). Plateau defects displaced significantly less at 1000N when using α-BSM™ in comparison to cancellous bone (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

In this cadaveric study, α-BSM™ is an effective bone substitute compared with cancellous bone graft for stabilizing split depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles