Abstract
Background:From 1994, we have used therapeutic hypothermia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 5 or less). In 2000, we altered the target temperature to 35°C from the former 33°C, as our findings suggested that cooling to 35°C is sufficient to control intracranial hypertension, and that hypothermia below 35°C may predispose patients to persistent cumulative oxygen debt. We attempted to clarify whether 35°C hypothermia has the same effect as 33°C hypothermia in reducing intracranial hypertension and whether it is associated with fewer complications and improved outcomes.
Methods:We compared intracranial pressure (ICP) and biochemical parameters in the 30 patients treated with 35°C hypothermia (January 2000 to June 2005) with those in the 31 patients treated with 33°C hypothermia (July 1994 to December 1999).
Results:Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. The mean temperature during hypothermia was 35.1 ± 0.7°C in the 35°C hypothermia group and 33.4 ± 0.8°C in the 33°C hypothermia group. Mean ICP was controlled under 20 mm Hg during hypothermia in both the 35°C hypothermia and 33°C hypothermia groups. The incidence of intracranial hypertension and low cerebral perfusion pressure did not differ between the two groups. The 35°C hypothermic patients exhibited a significant improvement in the decline of serum potassium concentrations during hypothermia and in the increment of C-reactive protein after rewarming. The mortality rate and the incidence of systemic complications tended to be lower in the 35°C group.
Conclusions:Cooling patients to 35°C is safe and the ICP reduction effects of 35°C hypothermia are similar to those of 33°C hypothermia.