Effect of training on the relationship between maximal and submaximal strength


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of a dynamic seven to 10 repetition maximum (7–10 RM) test to estimate maximal knee extension strength (1-RM) in untrained and trained subjects. Thirty-three men and 25 women (25 ± 5 yr) were randomly assigned to a group that trained two or three times. wk−1 for 18 wk (N = 47) or a control group (N‘ = 11). Training included one set of 7–10 repetitions to volitional fatigue on a NautilusTM knee extension machine, Prior to (T1) and after training (T2) dynamic strength was evaluated by 1-RM and 7–10 RM tests. The 7–10 RM test consisted of one set of variable resistance knee extension exercise performed to volitional fatigue with a weight that allowed 7–10 repetitions. The training group improved their 1-RM and 7–10 RM strength (by 31.7 and 51.4%, respectively) (P ≥ 0.01) while the control group did not change. Training increased relative 7–10 RM strength (68.4% of 1-RM at T1 and 79.1% of 1-RM at T2) (P ≥ 0.01). The relationship between the 7–10 RM weight and 1-RM at T1 was linear: 1-RM = 1.554 (7–10 RM weight) - 5.181; R2 = 0.89; SEE = 9.3 kg. Application of this equation following training resulted in a systematic overprediction (p ≥ 0.01) of 1-RM (21.2 kg) in trained subjects. Therefore, a second linear equation was developed to predict 1-RM in trained subjects: 1-RM = 1.172 (7–10 RM weight) + 7.704; R2 = 0.91; SEE = 9.9 kg. Our results indicate that a test consisting of 7–10 repetitions performed to exhaustion can accurately predict 1-RM knee extension strength. However, resistance training alters the relationship between maximal and submaximal strength, and thus the level of training is an important consideration when estimating 1-RM strength from a multiple repetition test performed to volitional fatigue.

    loading  Loading Related Articles