The purpose of this study was to assess the cardiorespiratory responses during arm exercise with and without concurrent electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling in people with paraplegia.Methods:
On separate days, 10 subjects with spinal cord injuries (T5-T12) performed either arm cranking (ACE), or simultaneous arm cranking + electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling (ACE+ES-LCE) graded exercise tests.Results:
During submaximal, steady-state exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199906000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222705Z/r/image-pngO2, (by 0.25-0.28 L·min−1), stroke volume (by 13 mL), and JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199906000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222705Z/r/image-pngeBTPS (by 9.4 L·min−1) compared with ACE alone. In contrast, there were no significant differences of submaximal HR, cardiac output, or power output between the exercise modes. At maximal exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199906000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222705Z/r/image-pngO2 (by 0.23 L·min−1) compared with ACE alone, but there were no differences in power output, HR, or JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199906000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222705Z/r/image-pngeBTPS.Conclusions:
These results demonstrate that during submaximal or maximal exercise there was a greater metabolic stress elicited during ACE+ES-LCE compared with during ACE alone. The higher stroke volume observed during submaximal ACE+ES-LCE, in the absence of any difference in HR, implied a reduced venous pooling and higher cardiac volume loading during ACE+ES-LCE. These results suggest that training incorporating ACE+ES-LCE may be more effective in improving aerobic fitness in people with paraplegia than ACE alone.