Effects of Hypoxic Interval Training on Cycling Performance

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid



The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent hypoxic interval training improves sea level cycling performance more than equivalent training in hypoxia or normoxia.


Thirty-three well-trained cyclists and triathletes (25.9 ± 2.7 yr, V̇O2max 66.1 ± 6.1 mL·min−1·kg−1) were divided into three groups: intermittent hypoxic (IHT, N = 11, PIO2 of 100 mm Hg), intermittent hypoxic interval training (IHIT, N = 11) and normoxia (Nor, N = 11, PIO2 of 160 mm Hg) and completed a 7-wk training program, consisting of two high-intensity (100 or 90% relative peak power output) interval training sessions each week. Each interval training session was performed in a laboratory on the subject's own bicycle, in normoxic or hypoxic conditions for the Nor and the IHT group, respectively. The IHIT group performed warm-up and cool-down plus recovery from each interval in hypoxic conditions. In contrast to IHT, interval exercise bouts were performed in normoxic conditions.


Mean power output during a 10-min cycle time trial improved after the first 4 wk of training by 5.2 ± 3.9, 3.7 ± 5.9, and 5.0 ± 3.4% for IHIT, IHT, and Nor, respectively, without significant differences between groups. Moreover, mean power output did not show any significant improvement in the following 3 wk in any group. V̇O2max (L·min−1) increased only in IHIT during the training period (8.7 ± 9.1%; P < 0.05). No changes in cycling efficiency or in hematological variables (P > 0.05) were observed.


Four weeks of interval training induced an improvement in endurance performance. However, short-term exposure to hypoxia (∼114 min·wk−1) did not elicit a greater increase in performance or any hematological modifications.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles