Computerized exposure therapy for Spider Phobia: Effects of cardiac timing and interoceptive ability on subjective and behavioral outcomes

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objective

Spider phobia is a common form of anxiety disorder for which exposure therapy is an effective first-line treatment. Motivated by the observed modulation of threat processing by afferent cardiac signals; we tested the hypothesis that interoceptive information concerning cardiovascular arousal can influence the outcomes of computerised exposure therapy for spider phobia.

Method

Fifty-three normal healthy participants with high spider phobia scores underwent one of three modified computerised exposure protocols, defined by the timing of exposure to brief spider stimuli within the cardiac cycle: Systole (during afferent baroreceptor firing); Diastole (during baroreceptor-quiescent interbeat interval); Random (non-contingent on cardiac cycle). Outcomes were judged on phobic and anxiety measures and physiological data (skin conductance). Subjects were also rated on interoceptive accuracy.

Results

Mancova analysis showed that timing group affected the outcome measures (F(10,80)=2.405, p=0.015) and there was a group interaction with interoception ability (F(15,110)=1.808, p=0.045). Subjective symptom reduction (SPQ) was greatest in the Systolic group relative to the other two groups (Diastolic (t=3.115, ptukey=0.009); Random (t=2.438, ptukey=0.048), with greatest reductions in those participants with lower interoceptive accuracy. Behavioural aversion (BAT) reduced more in cardiac-contingent groups than the non-contingent (Random) group (Diastolic (t=3.295, ptukey=0.005); Systolic (t=2.602, ptukey=0.032). Physiological (SCR) responses remained strongest for spider stimuli presented at cardiac systole.

Conclusion

Interoceptive information influences exposure benefit. The reduction in the subjective expression of fear/phobia is facilitated by ‘bottom-up’ afferent signals; while improvement in the behavioural expression is further dependent on ‘top-down’ representation of self-related physiology (heart rhythm). Individual interoceptive differences moderate these effects, suggesting means to personalise therapy.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles