On the Understanding of Clinical Instability

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Study Design

Three-dimensional flexibility changes due to the application of an external fixator at C4-C5 were studied in cervical spine specimens.

Objectives

to evaluate the biomechanical effects of applying a cervical external fixator to a patient using an in vitro model.

Summary of Background Data

There is controversy regarding the relationship between the changes in spinal motion and clinical instability.

Methods

Using fresh cadaveric C4-C7 specimens, multidirectional flexibility was measured at all vertebral levels, before and after the fixator application at C4-C5, C5-C6, and C4-C6.

Results

The average ranges of motion for flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were 8.3° 7.2°, 5.3°, and 5.6°, which descreased by 40%, 27%, 32%, and 58%, repectively, because of the fixator application. The corresponding neutral zones were 3.4°, 3.4°, 3.0°, and 2.0°, which decreased by 76%, 76%, 54%, and 69%, respectively. The decreases with the fixation at C4-C5 were similar to those for fixation at C5-C6.

Conclusions

This in vitro study documented that the application of an external fixator to the cervical spine decreases the intervertebral motion in general, and decreases flexion, extension and torsional neutral zones in particular. The findings help explain the clincal instability of the spine and support the hypothesis that the neutral zone is more closely associated with the clinical instability than is the range of motion.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles