Concurrent Validity of Vertical Jump Performance Assessment Systems

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Castagna, C, Ganzetti, M, Ditroilo, M, Giovannelli, M, Rocchetti, A, and Manzi, V. Concurrent validity of vertical jump performance assessment systems. J Strength Cond Res 27(3): 761–768, 2013—The aim of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of 2 portable systems for vertical jump (VJ) assessment under field conditions. The VJ flight times assessed using an optical mat (Optojump) and an accelerometer-based (Myotest) system were compared with that of a force platform. The flight times recorded during a countermovement jump (CMJ) were collected from 20 rugby players (n = 86 jumps) concurrently using the 3 tracking systems. Significant bias between the Force platform and either the Optojump (bias = 0.006 ± 0.007; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004–0.007 seconds) and Myotest (bias = −0.031 ± 0.021; 95% CI 0.035 to −0.026s; p < 0.0001) occurred. A nearly perfect correlation was found between force platform and Optojump (r = 0.99; 95% CI 0.098–0.99; p < 0.0001). Force platform and Myotest (r = 0.89; 95% CI 0.084–0.93; p < 0.0001) flight times showed very large association. Difference between Optojump and Myotest systems was significant (−0.036 ± 0.021 seconds; 95% CI −0.041 to −0.032; p < 0.0001), which results in Myotest mean flight time being approximately 7.2% longer than the Optojump flight time. The association between Optojump and Myotest was nearly perfect (r = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.94; p < 0.0001). This study showed that the Optojump and Myotest systems possess convergent validity and can be successfully used under field conditions to assess VJ while performing a CMJ. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting data obtained from different portable systems for field measurement.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles