The Effect of Different Exercise Protocols and Regression-Based Algorithms on the Assessment of the Anaerobic Threshold

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Zuniga, JM, Housh, TJ, Camic, CL, Bergstrom, HC, Schmidt, RJ, and Johnson, GO. The effect of different exercise protocols and regression-based algorithms on the assessment of the anaerobic threshold. J Strength Cond Res 28(9): 2507–2512, 2014—The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ramp and step incremental cycle ergometer tests on the assessment of the anaerobic threshold (AT) using 3 different computerized regression-based algorithms. Thirteen healthy adults (mean age and body mass [SD] = 23.4 [3.3] years and body mass = 71.7 [11.1] kg) visited the laboratory on separate occasions. Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance with appropriate follow-up procedures were used to analyze the data. The step protocol resulted in greater mean values across algorithms than the ramp protocol for the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 (step = 1.7 [0.6] L·min−1 and ramp = 1.5 [0.4] L·min−1) and heart rate (HR) (step = 133 [21] b·min−1 and ramp = 124 [15] b·min−1) at the AT. There were no significant mean differences, however, in power outputs at the AT between the step (115.2 [44.3] W) and the ramp (112.2 [31.2] W) protocols. Furthermore, there were no significant mean differences for V[Combining Dot Above]O2, HR, or power output across protocols among the 3 computerized regression-based algorithms used to estimate the AT. The current findings suggested that the protocol selection, but not the regression-based algorithms can affect the assessment of the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and HR at the AT.

    loading  Loading Related Articles