Testing for HER-2/ neu in Breast Cancer: Is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Superior in Predicting Outcome?: On: Assessment of methods for tissue-based detection of the HER-2/ neu alterations in human breast cancer: a direct comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Pauletti G, Dandekar S, Rong H, et al. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3651–3664


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Summary:Testing for alterations in HER-2/ neu in breast cancer has become increasingly popular in recent years, particularly with the recent development of a humanized antiHER-2/ neu monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab, which is currently being employed in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy to treat metastatic breast cancer in patients whose tumors exhibit this HER-2/ neu alteration. Controversy exists not only on the optimal method of laboratory testing for this HER-2/ neu alteration (i.e., fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) versus immunohistochemistry (IHC) versus others), but also on the type of reagents used for a given method. A plethora of published studies on tissue-based HER-2/ neu testing has recently appeared in many peer-reviewed journals; many have concluded that IHC could be used as a first-line screening test, with the recommendation of FISH to confirm indeterminate results. In contrast to these studies, a recent study by Pauletti et al. showed that HER-2/ neu testing by IHC does not predict clinical outcome as accurately as does FISH. This commentary discusses the findings of this study, within a broader review of critical issues relating to HER-2/ neu testing in breast cancer.

    loading  Loading Related Articles