|| Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid
Recent reports by the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register for New interventions and Procedures (ASERNIP-S) and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) concluded that insufficient evidence is available to assess the safety of the open versus closed laparoscopy in regard to major vascular and visceral injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the relative safety of open and closed laparoscopy with respect to rates of major vascular and visceral injuries. A combined prospective/retrospective review of a single-surgeon series of 5900 open laparoscopies was performed. A meta-analysis of all reported series of open and closed laparoscopy was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE search engines to compare major vascular and visceral injury rates. Medicolegal and manufacturer device reports were also reviewed. The case series of 5900 open laparoscopies reported a single visceral injury and no major vascular injuries. The meta-analysis revealed 336 major vascular injuries in 760,890 closed laparoscopies, a mean rate of 0.044%, 1 injury per 2272 cases, compared with 0 injuries in 22,465 open laparoscopies (P = 0.003). Visceral injuries occurred more frequently, 515 injuries in 760,890 closed laparoscopies (mean rate, 0.07) and 11 injuries in 22,465 open laparoscopies (mean rate, 0.05; P = 0.18). Medicolegal and device reports revealed a further 647 major vascular injuries and 500 major visceral injuries. In contrast to the conclusion formed by the RANZCOG and ASERNIP-S, the available evidence shows that open laparoscopy eliminates the risk of major vascular injury and reduces the rate of major visceral injuries. Open laparoscopy using the Hasson cannula should be the preferred method of peritoneal access.