Journal of Addiction Medicine. 4(3):123-130, SEPTEMBER 2010

DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181db6b67

,  

PMID: 20936079

Issn Print: 1932-0620

Publication Date: September 2010


Share this on facebook   Share this on Twitter   Share this on LinkedIn   Email this article  



Print

Screening and Brief Intervention for Unhealthy Drug Use in Primary Care Settings: Randomized Clinical Trials Are Needed

Richard Saitz;Daniel P. Alford;Judith Bernstein;Debbie M. Cheng;Jeffrey Samet;Tibor Palfai;

+ Author Information


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

The efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for drug use in primary care patients is largely unknown. Because of this lack of evidence, US professional organizations do not recommend it. Yet, a strong theoretical case can be made for drug SBI. Drug use is common and associated with numerous health consequences, patients usually do not seek help for drug abuse and dependence, and SBI has proven efficacy for unhealthy alcohol use. On the other hand, the diversity of drugs of abuse and the high prevalence of abuse and dependence among those who use them raise concerns that drug SBI may have limited or no efficacy. Federal efforts to disseminate SBI for drug use are underway, and reimbursement codes to compensate clinicians for these activities have been developed. However, the discrepancies between science and policy developments underscore the need for evidence-based research regarding the efficacy of SBI for drug use. This article discusses the rationale for drug SBI and existing research on its potential to improve drug-use outcomes and makes the argument that randomized controlled trials to determine its efficacy are urgently needed to bridge the gap between research, policy, and clinical practice.

Related Topics

    Related Articles

        loading  Loading Related Articles