DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318262c393

,  

Issn Print: 2151-8378

Publication Date: 2012/07/01


Print

Mesh Erosion in Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Erratum

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Excerpt

In the article by Osmundsen et al, entitled “Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy,” which appeared in the March/April issue of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (2012;18:86-88), there was an error in the Results section of the abstract. The sentence should read: Total hysterectomy mesh erosion rate at site 1 was 37% compared with 3% at site 2. Mesh type was the only identifiable difference between sites: precut polypropylene at site 1, self-cut polypropylene at site 2.
The 3 and 37% were transposed in first sentence, as was the precut and self-cut in second sentence.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles