Strengths and weaknesses in team communication processes in a UK emergency department setting: findings using the Communication Assessment Tool-Team

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


IntroductionIdentifying weaknesses in emergency department (ED) communication may highlight areas where quality improvement may be beneficial. This study explores whether the Communication Assessment Tool-Team (CAT-T) survey can identify communication strengths and weaknesses in a UK setting.ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the frequency of patient responses for each item on the CAT-T survey and to compare the proportion of responses according to patient and operational characteristics.MethodsAdults presenting to the minors area of a semi-urban ED between April and May 2015 were included. Those lacking capacity or in custody were excluded. Multivariate analysis identified associations between responses and demographic/operational characteristics.ResultsA total of 407/526 eligible patients responded (77.3%). Respondents were mostly White British (93.9%), with a median age of 45 years. Most responses were obtained during daytime hours (84.2% between 08 : 00 and 18 : 00). The median reported times to triage, assessment and disposition were 15, 35 and 90 min, respectively. Items most frequently rated as ‘very good’/‘excellent’ (strengths) were ‘ambulance staff treated me with respect’ (86.7%), ED staff ‘let me talk without interruptions’ (85%) and ‘paid attention to me’ (83.7%). Items most frequently rated as ‘poor’/‘fair’ (weaknesses) were ‘encouraged me to ask questions’, ‘reception treated me with respect’ (10.4%) and ‘staff showed an interest in my health’ (6.8%). Arrival time, analgesia at triage and time to assessment were associated with significantly increased odds of positive perception of team communication for a range of items.ConclusionThe CAT-T survey may be used within a UK setting to identify discrete strengths and weaknesses in ED team communication.

    loading  Loading Related Articles