Over the past few decades, many different types of nanomedicines have been evaluated, both in vitro and in vivo. In general, nanomedicines are designed to improve the in vivo properties of low-molecular-weight (chemo-) therapeutic drugs, i.e. their biodistribution and the target site accumulation, and to thereby improve the balance between their efficacy and toxicity. A significant number of studies have also addressed the in vitro properties of nanomedicines, showing e.g. their ability to overcome cellular multidrug resistance (MDR). Particularly promising results in this regard have been reported for ‘pharmacologically active’ carrier materials, such as Pluronics, which are able to directly inhibit drug efflux pumps and other cellular detoxification mechanisms. In the present report, we have set out to evaluate the ability of classical (and pharmacologically inactive) carrier materials to overcome MDR. To this end, four different drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cell lines were treated with increasing concentrations of free doxorubicin, of polymer-bound doxorubicin, of micellar doxorubicin and of liposomal doxorubicin, and resistance indices (IC50 in resistant cells/IC50 in sensitive cells) were determined. In addition, the cellular uptake of the four formulations was evaluated using fluorescence microscopy. It was found that the carrier materials did manage to overcome MDR to some extent, but that the overall benefit was quite small; only for polymer-bound doxorubicin in A431 cells, a significant (4-fold) reduction in the resistance index was observed. These findings indicate that the ability of classical nanomedicines to overcome cellular MDR should not be overestimated.