Can Survival Bias Explain the Age Attenuation of Racial Inequalities in Stroke Incidence?: A Simulation Study

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background:

In middle age, stroke incidence is higher among black than white Americans. For unknown reasons, this inequality decreases and reverses with age. We conducted simulations to evaluate whether selective survival could account for observed age patterning of black–white stroke inequalities.

Methods:

We simulated birth cohorts of 20,000 blacks and 20,000 whites with survival distributions based on US life tables for the 1919–1921 birth cohort. We generated stroke incidence rates for ages 45–94 years using Reasons for Geographic and Racial Disparities in Stroke (REGARDS) study rates for whites and setting the effect of black race on stroke to incidence rate difference (IRD) = 20/10,000 person-years at all ages, the inequality observed at younger ages in REGARDS. We compared observed age-specific stroke incidence across scenarios, varying effects of U, representing unobserved factors influencing mortality and stroke risk.

Results:

Despite a constant adverse effect of black race on stroke risk, the observed black–white inequality in stroke incidence attenuated at older age. When the hazard ratio for U on stroke was 1.5 for both blacks and whites, but U only directly influenced mortality for blacks (hazard ratio for U on mortality =1.5 for blacks; 1.0 for whites), stroke incidence rates in late life were lower among blacks (average observed IRD = −43/10,000 person-years at ages 85–94 years versus causal IRD = 20/10,000 person-years) and mirrored patterns observed in REGARDS.

Conclusions:

A relatively moderate unmeasured common cause of stroke and survival could fully account for observed age attenuation of racial inequalities in stroke.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles