Duty-cycled multi-electrode radiofrequency vs. conventional irrigated point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation: comparative 3-year data

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Aims

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted treatment to relieve symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We studied 3 year outcome after PVI guided by duty-cycled multi-electrode radiofrequency (RF) ablation (pulmonary vein ablation catheter, PVAC) and provided comparative data to outcome after conventional PVI (CPVI) using mapping with irrigated, point-per-point RF ablation.

Methods and results

One hundred and sixty-one consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF and minimal heart disease underwent PVI (PVAC, n = 79 vs. CPVI, n = 82). Follow-up (with symptom-guided rhythm monitoring) was truncated at 3 years in all patients. Success was defined as freedom of documented arrhythmia after a single procedure and without antiarrhythmic drug treatment (ADT). Baseline characteristics did not differ between both groups. At 3 years follow-up, single-procedure success without ADT was comparable between PVAC and CPVI (65% vs. 55%, P = NS). The majority of recurrences occurred during the first year (PVAC 79% vs. CPVI 70%, P = NS). The annual rate of very late recurrence (i.e. beyond 1 year) was similar in both groups (10.5% vs. 15%, P = NS).

Conclusion

At 3 years follow-up, outcome after PVAC-guided PVI is comparable to conventional isolation by irrigated point-by-point RF ablation. In both strategies, the majority of recurrences occurred in the first year of ablation.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles