Mitral valve area by the pressure half-time method does not correlate with mean gradient in mitral valve repair patients†


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

AimsPressure half-time is an inaccurate measure of mitral valve area in many clinical situations. The utility of the pressure half-time method to calculate mitral valve area after mitral valve repair is not well defined.Methods and resultsForty-two patients with a repaired mitral valve were identified. Mitral valve area was calculated by both the pressure half-time method and the continuity equation. The two mitral valve areas were then directly compared and also correlated with mean gradient. The two mitral valve areas were significantly different from one another with a mean of 1.81 ± 0.53 cm2 by continuity equation and 2.65 ± 0.69 cm2 by pressure half-time. The continuity equation correlated well with mean gradient (ρ = −0.63), whereas the correlation for pressure half-time was weak (r = −0.08).ConclusionA non-linear, inverse correlation was found between mitral valve area by the continuity equation and mean gradient. No correlation was found between the pressure half-time method for mitral valve area and mean gradient. The continuity equation likely provides a better estimate of mitral valve area in repaired mitral valves.

    loading  Loading Related Articles