Uncontrolled Randomized Clinical Trial Demonstrates Similar Long-Term (6 months) Antigingivitis and Antiplaque Efficacy for 2 Mouth Rinses: One that Uses Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) as an Active Agent and the Other that Uses Essential Oils (EO) as an Active Agent


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATIONComparison of the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride with an essential oil mouth rinse on dental plaque and gingivitis—a six-month randomized controlled clinical trialAlbert-Kiszely A, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Witt J, Hamilton A, Persson GR, et al.J Clin Periodontol 2007;34(8):658-67LEVEL OF EVIDENCE2PURPOSE/QUESTIONThe purpose of this study was to compare the long-term (6 months) clinical and microbiological effects of an experimental CPC mouth rinse with that of a commercially available and widely used EO mouth rinse in an unsupervised, uncontrolled 6-month randomized clinical trial.SOURCE OF FUNDINGThis study was supported by a grant from the manufacture of the experimental CPC mouth rinse, Procter & Gamble Company (Mason, OH), and by the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, University of Berne, Switzerland.TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGNThis is a parallel randomized 2-group study that had no negative control.

    loading  Loading Related Articles