PTU-083 Early specialist follow-up of patients recently hospitalised for decompensated chronic liver disease is associated with improved clinical outcomes

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid



The benefit of early specialist outpatient follow-up (FU) in patients admitted with decompensated chronic liver disease (DCLD) is unclear, although evidence from the United States suggests reduced overall mortality1. Applicability to United Kingdom practice is unknown, where in-patient care may be managed by general physicians, gastroenterologists or dedicated hepatologists.


We introduced a discharge clinic (DC) for early (within 14 days) specialist FU of all DCLD admissions, and compared clinic outcomes of those who did and did not attend (DNA).


A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients offered DC review following DCLD admission at our service from May 2014-June 2015. Survival, readmission, future clinic attendance and timely variceal/hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and dietetic review were compared between attenders and DNA.


77 patients were included; 70.2% had alcohol related disease. Commonest causes for admission were ascites (34.4%) and jaundice (15.1%). 57 (74%) of survivors attended DC.


Attenders had significantly increased mean survival compared to DNA (552 vs 428 days; p=0.0397), and were also more likely to attend subsequent clinical FU (mean attendances 2.65 vs 1.25; p=0.0006). There was a trend towards reduced readmission rate in attenders which did not reach significance (2.12 vs 2.55 admissions; p=0.5828).


In attenders, Child-Pugh (CP) score improved from admission to DC (9-8; p=0.0023), and from admission to 6 months later (p=0.0197). Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score improved from admission to DC (15-12; p=0.023) and from admission to 4 months later (p=0.016); this benefit was still observed at 15 months (p=0.0115). DNA showed no significant improvement between admission and 6 month CP (p=0.0991) or 4 month MELD score (p=0.3959).


Many patients did not have varices/HCC surveillance arranged pre-discharge, which was instead booked at DC. Although rates of variceal surveillance did not significantly vary between attenders and DNA (93% vs 80%; p=0.1942), DNA were significantly less likely to enter HCC surveillance (80% vs 100%; p=0.0036). Finally, attenders were more likely to have had dietetic review or assessment (87.7% vs 65%; p=<0.0001).


DC attendance was associated with superior survival and reduced CP/MELD scores over time, and improved rates of varices/HCC surveillance and dietetic input. This suggests there may an important role for early specialist FU of DCLD in improving clinical outcomes.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles