An Economic Evaluation of Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis In Adolescent Males

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objective

To assess the cost-effectiveness of identifying asymptomatic carriers of Chlamydia trachomatis among adolescent males.

Design

Cost-effectiveness analysis based on cohort analytic studies previously reported and average salaries and costs of medical care in Sweden.

Setting

Adolescent males attending a primary care center for routine health checks.

Participants

Estimates of costs and benefits are based on a cohort of 1000 adolescent males and their female contacts.

Intervention

Screening with enzyme immunoassay (EIA), either on leukocyte esterase (LE)-positive urine samples (LE-EIA screening) or on all urine samples (EIA screening), was compared with no screening (no treatment or contact tracing). The effects of confirming positive EIA results with a blocking assay and alternative antibiotic regimens on the outcome of the screening strategies were also evaluated.

Results

Compared with no screening, the LE-EIA and EIA screening strategies reduced the overall costs when the prevalence of chlamydial infection in males exceeded 2% and 10%, respectively. Enzyme immunoassay screening achieved an overall cure rate that was 12.2% to 12.6% (95% confidence interval) better, but reduced the incremental savings by at least $2144 per cured male, in comparison with LE-EIA screening. Confirmation of positive EIA results reduced the overall cost of the LE-EIA screening strategy when the prevalence of C trachomatis among males was less than 8%. Compared with a 7-day course of doxycycline, a single oral dose of azithromycin administered under supervision in the clinic improved the cure rates of both EIA and LE-EIA screening strategies by 15.1% to 16.3% and 11.2% to 12.0%, respectively, while reducing the corresponding overall costs by 5% and 9%, respectively, regardless of the prevalence of chlamydial infection in males.

Conclusion

The use of LE-EIA screening combined with treatment of positive cases with azithromycin was the most cost-effective intervention strategy focusing on asymptomatic male carriers of C trachomatis. Positive EIA results should be confirmed when screening low-risk populations.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles