Predictors of Laparoscopic Complications After Formal Training in Laparoscopic Surgery.

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the relationship between laparoscopic complication rates and surgeon-dependent variables following a laparoscopic training course.

Design

Participants were surveyed regarding their interval laparoscopic experience 3 months and 12 months after the course.

Participants

Course participants/survey respondents represented a cross section of urologic surgeons in the United States. A total of 181 individuals (61% of 297 participants) completed and returned the 3-month questionnaire. A total of 128 surgeons responded to the 12-month questionnaire (78.5% of 163 participants).

Main Outcome Measure

Logistic regression analysis tested the relationship between surgeons' complication rates and study variables.

Results

At 3 months, surgeons who performed clinical procedures without additional training were 3.39 times more likely to have at least one complication compared with surgeons who sought additional training (P=.03). At 12 months, surgeons who had attended the training course alone, were in solo practice, or performed laparoscopic surgery with a variable assistant were 4.85, 7.74, and 4.80 times more likely, respectively, to have had a complication than their counterparts who attended the course with a partner, were in group practice, or operated with the same assistant (P=.004, P=.0008, and P=.0015, respectively). At both 3 and 12 months, laparoscopic complication rates of individual surgeons demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with the number of laparoscopic procedures performed.

Conclusions

The rate of complications associated with the clinical learning curve can be decreased by additional education following an initial course in laparoscopy. An ongoing clinical association with surgeons performing similar procedures decreases long-term complication rates.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles